A salt marsh that is largely natural and healthy can present
a broad array of physical habitats, species diversity, abundances,
and temporal variability. This range of conditions is due
to the adaptations of salt-marsh flora and fauna to the variability
in their physical environment. This variability has made it
difficult to develop general health assessments for salt-marsh
systems. Salt marsh health can be broadly assessed by considering:
· Physical habitat stability through sediment erosion
and deposition
· Connectivity of the marsh with adjacent ecosystems
· Within-marsh ecological communities
· Overall water quality.
Because marshes sit at the high-energy interface of land
and sea, a stable or benevolent physical setting is key for
marsh development and stability. This stability, by definition,
requires the efficient exchange of materials between the marsh
and its adjacent upland and marine habitats, which can be
defined as connectivity. In conjunction with physical processes,
a persistent plant community is also required as a major positive
feedback for habitat stability. Marsh plants also comprise
the ecosystem’s base in terms of primary production
and habitat structure. Thus, they play dual roles in physical
and ecological health. Finally, water quality encompasses
several key components of marsh health including nutrient
regime, water and sediment exchange, and marsh surface hydrodynamics.
Taken together, these multiple characteristics reflect key
aspects of saltmarsh condition and might be used through monitoring
or investigation to assess overall health.
No specific measure has been identified as a sufficiently
reliable indicator of marsh health. In large part, this is
because it cannot be assumed that pristine or healthy salt
marshes are similar in key physical and biological characteristics.
A way around this problem may be to think of indicators of
health in the negative, in that monitoring would seek to measure
differences from acceptable conditions. It may also be that
the presence of clear and negative trends, such as rapid marsh
loss and/or dominance of non-native species, would be another
means of determining a marsh is not healthy.
Trend analysis is likely to be the more useful assessment
means, because in most cases salt marshes are already altered
or impacted, with limited possibility for restoration to pristine
conditions. Thus, data trends can reveal whether an otherwise
impacted marsh system is relatively healthy or is losing its
health. In systems as complex and variable as salt marshes,
just identifying such trends would be important and useful
accomplishments.
There are several characteristics that might be expected
of all salt marshes that are in reasonable health. These include
a relatively stable vegetated area, limited extent of invasive
plants, and presence of obligate marsh species. The table
below suggests how these might be measured and evaluated to
create first-order assessments of marsh health.
Proposed Indices
for Marsh Health on Long Island
Health
Indicator |
Good
Condition |
Alert
Status |
Marsh stability |
Net loss of vegetated
wetland <1% per year |
Net loss of vegetated
wetland >3% per year |
Plant health (for
S. alterniflora only – health of the high marsh
presumably threatened by Phragmites invasion rather
than vegetation loss as in the low marsh) |
<5% of vegetated
marsh with stem densities below 100/m2ortotal below-ground
biomass from 0-20 cm >3000 g/m2 |
>10% of vegetated
marsh with stem densities below 100/m2ortotal below-ground
biomass from 0-20 cm <1500 g/m2 |
Invasive species |
<30% Phragmites
sp. |
>50% Phragmites
sp. |
Resident finfish |
Killifish group represented
in most or all suitable habitats |
Killifish group absent
from >30% of suitable habitats |
Species of Interest
(e.g., marsh sparrows, terrapins, forb plants, others) |
Stable population
or consistent use of marsh by species of special State
or Federal status |
No species of concern
present or viable |
Temporal trends |
Selected indicator
does not trend negatively in 3 or more consecutive years
|
Selected indicator
trends negatively in 3 or more consecutive years |
Note:
marsh characteristics between Good and Alert condition
should be considered to be Of Concern and monitored
closely |
|